| Name |
Comments |
|
|
 Thursday, 24 March 2005 07:28 PM
Hehe kind of annoyed me actually after getting it because I did basically that way before I figured it out but never realized it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
 Thursday, 24 March 2005 07:27 PM
Took about 8 tries to realize I was missing a rose...great puzzle
|
 |
Tuquee  |
Location:
Canada
Canada
|
|
#3178
|
|
 Thursday, 24 March 2005 06:06 PM
Sweet.
|
 |
| 240_alty |
|
|
#3177
|
|
 Thursday, 24 March 2005 04:06 PM
got it right away  not bad though!
|
 |
|
|
 Thursday, 24 March 2005 04:02 PM
I guess I have a simple mind.
|
 |
Jason K  |
Location:
Mesa, Arizona
USA
|
|
#3175
|
|
 Thursday, 24 March 2005 03:44 PM
Took me about 5 rolls but ive got it now.
|
 |
|
|
 Thursday, 24 March 2005 03:08 PM
Took me a while. I'm sure Taoists got it quick
|
 |
Peter  |
Location:
Karlstad
Sweden
|
|
#3173
|
|
 Thursday, 24 March 2005 02:30 PM
Well this wasn't to difficult
|
 |
B  |
Location:
Honolulu, Hawaii
USA
|
|
#3172
|
|
 Thursday, 24 March 2005 12:40 PM
Heh - did it in 2 minutes. I think that this is more of a reading comprehension exercise than a math teaser.
|
 |
jo-na  |
Location:
philippines
Philippines
|
|
#3171
|
|
 Thursday, 24 March 2005 12:11 PM
took me 3 days! i've long suspected that i tend to over analyze things in my day-to-day existence. this is proof. imagine!! it took me 3 days.
the solution kind of dawned on me on the 2nd day but i wasn't able to figure it out completely. i was just trying to look for the rose because the "petals have to be around the ROSE." how could i count the petals if there was no rose, right?
|
 |