| Name |
Comments |
roger9344  |
Location:
USA
USA
|
|
#3200
|
|
 Saturday, 26 March 2005 05:07 AM
Quite a challenge. Difficult to figure out, so very simple once you see the solution.
|
 |
 |
| Coco |
Location:
California
USA
|
|
#3199
|
|
 Saturday, 26 March 2005 01:46 AM
i think i was too uptight when i first tried the game. it took me forever. and when i finally did figure it out...i felt so dumb. haha
but it's a fun game. i like it.
|
 |
David Brocker  |
Sweden
|
|
#3198
|
|
 Saturday, 26 March 2005 01:37 AM
So simple in the end..
|
 |
Allan  |
Location:
Australia, SYdney
Australia
|
|
#3197
|
|
 Saturday, 26 March 2005 01:25 AM
OMG.... the answer was so easy... .god those 2 hours was painstakingly long.... cant believe it was so simple in the end...
well... i tried all operators including complex calculations, but..... (Slaps my self) im sucha a dork...
This is a Great Game...
Just goes to show... logic and luck does sometimes come in handy in tandem
|
 |
|
|
 Saturday, 26 March 2005 12:34 AM
haha, took me about 6 goes.... thought about the name and it made sence... My bro took three hours but he tends to over analyise things...
Natalie
|
 |
| Kistaro Windrider |
Location:
St. Louis, MO
USA
|
|
#3195
|
|
 Saturday, 26 March 2005 12:18 AM
Took me about eight trials to catch on. I never read the article, either... A simple puzzle of finding counts. Yay for being a CS major, I suppose.
|
 |
|
|
 Friday, 25 March 2005 07:43 PM
|
 |
Chris  |
Location:
Syracuse,New York
USA
|
|
#3193
|
|
 Friday, 25 March 2005 05:54 PM
It took me about 10 minutes. I couldn't get it but 2 rolls after I read the Bill Gates article it came to me. I can see how it takes some months and others just seconds.
|
 |
Cornelius McGilloway  |
Location:
Marlton, New Jersey
USA
|
|
#3192
|
|
 Friday, 25 March 2005 04:36 PM
I swear, being smart does NOT help for this!
Got it in an hour or so though, woo
|
 |
Gordon  |
Location:
Dallas |
|
#3191
|
|
 Friday, 25 March 2005 04:31 PM
Got lucky with my train of thought, got it in about 6 tries
|
 |