| Name |
Comments |
|
|
 Monday, 17 October 2005 03:54 PM
Took me an hour or so to find the answer. I made the mistake of ignoring the dice and compiling a list of solutions using numbers. I generated a couple of algorithms that were right a cetain percentage of the time.
I found the answer when I was reading the web page about how Bill Gates did it. When I realized that it had to be very simple algorithm that someone could do in their head with out much thought and most likely used a visual hint. When I saw a couple of solutions on that web page all next to each I figured it out right away.
I was annoyed I didn't figure it out using my original brute force math approach. I skipped a whole class of simple equations.
|
 |
 |
| Chris Smith |
|
|
#5829
|
|
 Monday, 17 October 2005 03:50 PM
 I have a smart freind that showed me this becuase he couldn't figure it out. it took me about 3 trys before i got it. It made me feel good until he said the simpler your mind was, the quicker you figure it out. Now that i know it i have to agree with him.
|
 |
Luke Gardiner  |
Location:
Sydney, NSW
Australia
|
|
#5828
|
|
 Monday, 17 October 2005 03:49 PM
Was stumped at first, and was worried I was going to take a long time where others have quickly discovered the secret. However, after about 10 minutes (8 rolls + a few to make sure I was correct) I solved the puzzle.
A very pleasing solution too. Great puzzle.
|
 |
|
|
 Monday, 17 October 2005 03:43 PM
After 30 minutes of trying to work this out, I put it away and came back to in a few hours later and figured it out in 5 minutes.
What a great reminder that was that the problems we are faced with every day sometimes need to be put down and looked at with a fresh mind.
|
 |
yeeehaaaa  |
New Zealand
|
|
#5826
|
|
 Monday, 17 October 2005 03:42 PM
It's too simple! Thankfully it only took me about 10 minutes to solve, but I could easily have been looking at it for hours.
|
 |
Brian W  |
Location:
Oakland CA
USA
|
|
#5825
|
|
 Monday, 17 October 2005 03:40 PM
Great puzzle. Got it after three failed attempts. It's good to be forced to think laterally, I probably lucked out because i was feeling lazy about working out the needlessly complex agorithms that where trying to present themselves to me, and rather than go for the bait i just stared at the instructions until.... voila!
|
 |
Lisa  |
Location:
Auckland
New Zealand
|
|
#5824
|
|
 Monday, 17 October 2005 03:36 PM
I was supposed to be working, but meh,I couldn't stand not figuring this one out. Took me a while thought. :P
|
 |
Peter Clary  |
Location:
Aldershot, Hampshire
United Kingdom
|
|
#5823
|
|
 Monday, 17 October 2005 03:13 PM
Well, it took me about an hour. I was feeling quite pleased until I saw some people got it in 4 minutes!
|
 |
elgatozorbas  |
Belgium
|
|
#5822
|
|
 Monday, 17 October 2005 03:12 PM
Took me half an hour of maths. After that I started concentrating on why the name is important. Good thing I didn't google for the answer...
|
 |
Daniel Ramski  |
Location:
Chicago, IL
USA
|
|
#5821
|
|
 Monday, 17 October 2005 03:11 PM
Got it in 25 rolls. Neat puzzle, the kind designed to drive grown men insane; glad I figured it out before I went crazy!
|
 |