| Name |
Comments |
| Joseph |
|
|
#3550
|
|
 Wednesday, 13 April 2005 01:22 AM
3 hours, no paper or pencil, no hints, and it's 4:19 in the f-ing morning. But hey, at least I got it. Would've taken a lot longer if it hadn't been for the subtle hints in the instructions.
|
 |
 |
Barry  |
Location:
Malvern, PA
USA
|
|
#3549
|
|
 Wednesday, 13 April 2005 01:12 AM
Really freakin' simple. Just think about what the rose is and you've got it.
|
 |
Sebastiaan Vugts  |
Location:
Zwijndrecht
Netherlands
|
|
#3548
|
|
 Wednesday, 13 April 2005 01:12 AM
This was frustrating. It took me an hour.
I think the reason why smart people take a long time to figure it out, is because they tend to think about a solution in a difficult manner.
Computer Engineers never check for a disconnected powercord when examining a malfunctioning computer... it's too simple.
|
 |
R.J.  |
Location:
Los Angeles
USA
|
|
#3547
|
|
 Wednesday, 13 April 2005 01:07 AM
Got it on the first try. I wish I hadn't, but I've subscribed to K.I.S.S. for too long.
I'll see how my friends do....
|
 |
Richard A  |
Location:
Florida
USA
|
|
#3546
|
|
 Wednesday, 13 April 2005 12:47 AM
Infuriatingly simple once you realize what's going on. Someone posted something about a mathematical algorithim that worked 100% for petals, i'm curious as to the veracity of that claim.
|
 |
Quek Chen Yi  |
Location:
Kluang
Malaysia
|
|
#3545
|
|
 Wednesday, 13 April 2005 12:32 AM
It is actually quite easy once u realised how it plays ~
|
 |
cu0ngy  |
Location:
australia
Australia
|
|
#3544
|
|
 Wednesday, 13 April 2005 12:31 AM
hey i was just wondering what was the purpose of the puzzle cause it confused me when in the intro it said that the longer u take to solve the smarter u are well it toke me second try to get it does that mean i'm not smart i can accept that but i dont get it usually only smart ppl can solve puzzle or maybe i just got a creative way of thinking maybe its not about hom smart u are but how creative u are combine with maths as well. well thats all i have to say
|
 |
Ashley  |
Location:
Oak Harbor Wa
USA
|
|
#3543
|
|
 Wednesday, 13 April 2005 12:24 AM
I didn't get it at first but once I stepped away from the game and came back after awhile I finally got it... the answer is right in front of you..Easy once you get it
|
 |
| Jamie Irish |
|
|
#3542
|
|
 Tuesday, 12 April 2005 11:19 PM
The name of the game was hard to figure out - with regards to how it would help. I was inclined to pay attention to the outside dots, so it took a while to ignore the ones I did not need
|
 |
|
|
 Tuesday, 12 April 2005 07:41 PM
Took me around 1-2 hours. As soon as I saw this I started trying to find a logical mathematical explanation, when all you have to do is read the title. I think this is one of the things that tests how you can fully interpret everything you hear or understand, because as soon as I re-read your brief statement about "the name is important" I got the answer.
|
 |