| Name |
Comments |
Thomas S  |
Location:
Huntsville, Al
USA
|
|
#5590
|
|
 Sunday, 16 October 2005 10:48 PM
This thing had me goin for about a day then I finally took the name into account. I thought the name was trying to throw you off but it really is important!
|
 |
 |
Ken Abbott  |
Location:
Seattle, Washington
USA
|
|
#5589
|
|
 Sunday, 16 October 2005 10:47 PM
Got it suddenly, then felt dumb...
|
 |
chris  |
Location:
Vancouver
Canada
|
|
#5588
|
|
 Sunday, 16 October 2005 10:45 PM
Got it pretty quickly, but have no idea where the solution came from. I guess the sub-consious works in mysterious ways...
|
 |
Steve  |
Location:
Buda, TX
USA
|
|
#5587
|
|
 Sunday, 16 October 2005 10:44 PM
14 tries to decide the solution wasn't mathematical, two more tries to open my eyes (and my mind), and then the light went on.
|
 |
| Lars Johnson |
Sweden
|
|
#5586
|
|
 Sunday, 16 October 2005 10:44 PM
2 tries.
|
 |
Mike  |
Location:
Madison, WI
USA
|
|
#5585
|
|
 Sunday, 16 October 2005 10:44 PM
WHAT THE #@*%!.
I'm fairly certain I understand it, but that was REALLY pointless.
How in the world would you just assume that after a couple of tries?
|
 |
| David Liu |
Location:
Davis, Ca
USA
|
|
#5584
|
|
 Sunday, 16 October 2005 10:44 PM
40 minutes. Fun stuff
|
 |
thelastguardian  |
Canada
|
|
#5583
|
|
 Sunday, 16 October 2005 10:34 PM
Piece of cake
7 rolls, 5 minutes, and the "name is important" hint ;)
|
 |
nick  |
Location:
vancouver
Canada
|
|
#5582
|
|
 Sunday, 16 October 2005 10:29 PM
Man! this really bugged me for 10 minutes. Then the whole "Petals around the rose" thing kicked in.
Cool.
|
 |
jeff h  |
Location:
arlington, va
USA
|
|
#5581
|
|
 Sunday, 16 October 2005 10:28 PM
got it by reading the first three examples in the gates bit...I seriously hope he didn't have to memorize the sequences.
|
 |