| Name |
Comments |
| Lars Johnson |
Sweden
|
|
#5586
|
|
 Sunday, 16 October 2005 10:44 PM
2 tries.
|
 |
 |
Mike  |
Location:
Madison, WI
USA
|
|
#5585
|
|
 Sunday, 16 October 2005 10:44 PM
WHAT THE #@*%!.
I'm fairly certain I understand it, but that was REALLY pointless.
How in the world would you just assume that after a couple of tries?
|
 |
| David Liu |
Location:
Davis, Ca
USA
|
|
#5584
|
|
 Sunday, 16 October 2005 10:44 PM
40 minutes. Fun stuff
|
 |
thelastguardian  |
Canada
|
|
#5583
|
|
 Sunday, 16 October 2005 10:34 PM
Piece of cake
7 rolls, 5 minutes, and the "name is important" hint ;)
|
 |
nick  |
Location:
vancouver
Canada
|
|
#5582
|
|
 Sunday, 16 October 2005 10:29 PM
Man! this really bugged me for 10 minutes. Then the whole "Petals around the rose" thing kicked in.
Cool.
|
 |
jeff h  |
Location:
arlington, va
USA
|
|
#5581
|
|
 Sunday, 16 October 2005 10:28 PM
got it by reading the first three examples in the gates bit...I seriously hope he didn't have to memorize the sequences.
|
 |
|
|
 Sunday, 16 October 2005 10:22 PM
Figured out the secret in about 25 rolls, but I had no idea what the name had to do with anything.
|
 |
| Tyler |
Location:
Berkeley, CA |
|
#5579
|
|
 Sunday, 16 October 2005 10:22 PM
Here I am trying to live up to my engineering roots and apply math without giving in to the true simplicity. I am glad I didn't cheat and search for the answer. It's so rewarding to actually figure it out.
|
 |
| dan |
Location:
newport, RI
USA
|
|
#5578
|
|
 Sunday, 16 October 2005 10:16 PM
~15 minutes, ~30 rolls.
|
 |
| Devin Torres |
|
|
#5577
|
|
 Sunday, 16 October 2005 10:15 PM
Took me about 10 minutes, but I finally just cleared my mind and tried to think like a child again.
|
 |