| Name |
Comments |
Bruce  |
Location:
MI
USA
|
|
#1980
|
|
 Sunday, 20 February 2005 10:25 PM
Took me a few rounds.... and of course my brain was working way too hard to get it. I think it really is one of those, "the smarter you are, the harder it is" things.
|
 |
 |
Bill Carson  |
Location:
Virginia |
|
#1979
|
|
 Sunday, 20 February 2005 10:02 PM
Great puzzle. I overanalyzed it with every math I had in my bag. HEARING the name helped me
|
 |
Michael Zwerdling, R.N.  |
Location:
Elfers, Florida |
|
#1978
|
|
 Sunday, 20 February 2005 09:32 PM
Ah, yes...success is sweet.
Be sure to visit my website for the most fascinating book on nursing ever published.
www.nursepostcard.com
Hey, I figured out the game. The book is an art book: plenty of roses (of no man's land.)
|
 |
|
|
 Sunday, 20 February 2005 09:07 PM
It took me 4 tries. I should have paid more attention to the instructions. I was making it harder than it should have been.
|
 |
| Todd Morgan |
Location:
KY |
|
#1976
|
|
 Sunday, 20 February 2005 09:02 PM
Got it on roll one (or rather, assumed I had it, and did). Guess that makes me a moron.
|
 |
Alex G  |
Location:
NJ
USA
|
|
#1975
|
|
 Sunday, 20 February 2005 08:37 PM
it took me a little bit, but i got it. i new it was gonna be something easy. its kinda like this puzzle where uput pens on the table and have people figure out what number it is. everyone over analyzes but its really dumb
|
 |
|
|
 Sunday, 20 February 2005 08:23 PM
This is very rewarding when you finally figure it out. They weren't kidding when they said overanalyzing will get you nowhere.
|
 |
Joel Phillips  |
Japan
|
|
#1973
|
|
 Sunday, 20 February 2005 08:17 PM
Got it in 3 rolls
Very clever puzzle.
|
 |
|
|
 Sunday, 20 February 2005 07:51 PM
Oi, it took me 40+ minutes to figure it out XD
|
 |
|
|
 Sunday, 20 February 2005 06:08 PM
Wow this was incredibly simple. I got it in 5 seconds, it seemed so obvious. However I can see how over thinking it would make it nearly impossible to solve.
|
 |