| Name |
Comments |
Allen Woo  |
Location:
KL
Malaysia
|
|
#2086
|
|
 Monday, 21 February 2005 11:36 PM
Got it. The key is to think of it as a puzzle instead of a mathematical equation. Cool in its simplicity
|
 |
 |
| suse |
Location:
New york
USA
|
|
#2085
|
|
 Monday, 21 February 2005 11:35 PM
Im baffled not by the complexity of the game, rather by its blatant simplicity. I rolled and I knew. It was that simple. How in the world can these stories of Bill Gates and various other brainiacs be true? Since there's some sort of positive correlation asserted between the length of time it takes to figure it out and IQ, I guess it means Im really dumb. But I'm not, really.
|
 |
KaT  |
Location:
Edmonton, AB
Canada
|
|
#2084
|
|
 Monday, 21 February 2005 11:29 PM
I managed to get it in about 5 minutes, lol (dunno how that happened...). After trialing and erroring, granted...but I got it. XD
|
 |
Drew Miller  |
Location:
Tacoma, Washington
USA
|
|
#2083
|
|
 Monday, 21 February 2005 11:10 PM
This was very frustrating to me. I kept guessing, but I figured out a mathematical solution to it. It just took about a day or so. It was fun to keep myself occupied with this though.
|
 |
Justin Vlasits  |
Location:
Silver Spring Maryland
USA
|
|
#2082
|
|
 Monday, 21 February 2005 10:27 PM
i don't see what was so difficult about this, it took me 5 minutes and im just a high school sophomore.
|
 |
|
|
 Monday, 21 February 2005 10:24 PM
|
 |
Megan  |
Location:
Missouri
USA
|
|
#2080
|
|
 Monday, 21 February 2005 10:17 PM
It took me forever to figure this stupid thing out! I stared at it for at least an hour. But now that I know the secret, I can drive all my friends crazy!
|
 |
Amanda  |
Location:
SC
USA
|
|
#2079
|
|
 Monday, 21 February 2005 10:07 PM
Took me ages...I was way overthinking.
|
 |
Brandon  |
Location:
Alabama
USA
|
|
#2078
|
|
 Monday, 21 February 2005 09:57 PM
Didn't get it when I first looked at the puzzle.
Wanted to bang my head on the keyboard after I got it.
|
 |
Michael J. Stigler  |
Location:
Indianapolis, IN
USA
|
|
#2077
|
|
 Monday, 21 February 2005 09:56 PM
I don't know. I had an idea before the first roll & confirmed the solution as probably being correct after the second and practically had a proof after the third. I just don't get the confusion, after 10 samples there are only so many ways one could permute or combine the numbers. Oh well, if you have not yet solved it good luck! -- Michael
|
 |