| Name |
Comments |
Diana Bett  |
Location:
Colorado
USA
|
|
#3096
|
|
 Friday, 18 March 2005 06:49 PM
That should not have been that hard...
|
 |
 |
|
|
 Friday, 18 March 2005 06:09 PM
I found it out in an afternoon. Trick is not to have any exspectations...
|
 |
|
|
 Friday, 18 March 2005 05:31 PM
I got it without understanding the name - but now I get the name...booyah.
|
 |
Randy Hardee  |
Location:
Texas
USA
|
|
#3093
|
|
 Friday, 18 March 2005 04:32 PM
I was stumped for 3 weeks in overanalysis of the problem until I read this clue while looking at the dice: 'it's also called polar bears around the ice hole'. I was looking at the die with 5 on it while reading this. I did a big Homer Simpson 'Doooooh' when I did.
|
 |
Nick  |
Location:
Massachusetts |
|
#3092
|
|
 Friday, 18 March 2005 04:21 PM
WOW I CANT BELEIVE I DIDNT SEE THIS SOONER THAN 20 MOVES now i know why it took bill gates so long he was trying way to hard
|
 |
eDavila  |
Location:
Weslaco, TX
USA
|
|
#3091
|
|
 Friday, 18 March 2005 03:13 PM
3 rolls baby...
|
 |
|
|
 Friday, 18 March 2005 02:31 PM
So hard ... and yet so simple!
|
 |
Elmer Concepcion  |
USA
|
|
#3089
|
|
 Friday, 18 March 2005 11:02 AM
Second try, (Honest!)
*I laugh a little laugh, with him as much as at him, as I await my mathematician friend to solve this intriguing puzzle*
|
 |
|
|
 Friday, 18 March 2005 10:53 AM
7 rolls, i'd say that was pretty good.
|
 |
KathieL711  |
Location:
USA
USA
|
|
#3087
|
|
 Friday, 18 March 2005 10:21 AM
I gave up after at least 30 attempts. I don't even see a rose anywhere.
|
 |