| Name |
Comments |
Roy Clemmons  |
Location:
Texas
USA
|
|
#3100
|
|
 Friday, 18 March 2005 09:43 PM
Using the principles of the scientific method - hypothesis, experimentation, analysis and prediction, I solved it about two hours.
|
 |
 |
Stephen Chu  |
Location:
California
USA
|
|
#3099
|
|
 Friday, 18 March 2005 09:37 PM
Good for kicks. The write-up almost gives it away!
|
 |
Tony Chai  |
Location:
Singapore
Singapore
|
|
#3098
|
|
 Friday, 18 March 2005 09:19 PM
|
 |
Wisnu Widiarta  |
Location:
Jakarta
Indonesia
|
|
#3097
|
|
 Friday, 18 March 2005 07:21 PM
10 - 15 mnutes.
|
 |
Diana Bett  |
Location:
Colorado
USA
|
|
#3096
|
|
 Friday, 18 March 2005 06:49 PM
That should not have been that hard...
|
 |
|
|
 Friday, 18 March 2005 06:09 PM
I found it out in an afternoon. Trick is not to have any exspectations...
|
 |
|
|
 Friday, 18 March 2005 05:31 PM
I got it without understanding the name - but now I get the name...booyah.
|
 |
Randy Hardee  |
Location:
Texas
USA
|
|
#3093
|
|
 Friday, 18 March 2005 04:32 PM
I was stumped for 3 weeks in overanalysis of the problem until I read this clue while looking at the dice: 'it's also called polar bears around the ice hole'. I was looking at the die with 5 on it while reading this. I did a big Homer Simpson 'Doooooh' when I did.
|
 |
Nick  |
Location:
Massachusetts |
|
#3092
|
|
 Friday, 18 March 2005 04:21 PM
WOW I CANT BELEIVE I DIDNT SEE THIS SOONER THAN 20 MOVES now i know why it took bill gates so long he was trying way to hard
|
 |
eDavila  |
Location:
Weslaco, TX
USA
|
|
#3091
|
|
 Friday, 18 March 2005 03:13 PM
3 rolls baby...
|
 |