| Name |
Comments |
Jon Rawlings  |
United Kingdom
|
|
#140
|
|
 Tuesday, 10 August 2004 08:30 AM
Filled an Excel spreadsheet with calculations, upon realising that I had no real patterns with the amount of data I had I stopped thinking mathematically and got it instantly!
|
 |
 |
|
|
 Tuesday, 10 August 2004 03:08 AM
Got it when i started thinking of a mathematical solution... it didnt relate to the name at all though. later found a slightly simpler one, which is probably the expected solution
|
 |
Dheeraj Gangrade  |
Location:
India
India
|
|
#138
|
|
 Tuesday, 10 August 2004 01:15 AM
 .. i got it after i stopped searching for mathematical patterns.
Saturday, 14 August 2004 05:29 PM
david said:
me 2
|
|
 |
|
|
 Monday, 9 August 2004 03:24 PM
When I stopped trying to think in terms of mathematics I got it.
|
 |
Silent Collision  |
New Zealand
|
|
#136
|
|
 Saturday, 7 August 2004 06:45 PM
Took me a while - I'm not a logical thinker and looked for mathmatical ways around it. Finally worked it out - what an achievement!
Thanks for a brilliant puzzle.
|
 |
Pipster  |
United Kingdom
|
|
#135
|
|
 Saturday, 7 August 2004 02:14 PM
First try was right, but from the wrong reasoning. Got the right answer AND method on my second go - about... 10 seconds.
|
 |
| Willem van Gool |
Netherlands
|
|
#134
|
|
 Saturday, 7 August 2004 01:13 PM
I solved in in about 5 minutes
|
 |
| Wimmel |
|
|
#133
|
|
 Saturday, 7 August 2004 03:58 AM
Hi. Nice one. I solved it in abou 10 minutes
|
 |
|
|
 Friday, 6 August 2004 08:46 PM
Nice game, figured it in approximately 10 minutes. It was fun.
|
 |
Kerry M. Hodnett  |
Location:
Redmond, Washington
USA
|
|
#131
|
|
 Friday, 6 August 2004 06:47 PM
Nice puzzle. Solution time approximately 15 seconds. Cheers.
|
 |