| Name |
Comments |
|
|
 Friday, 20 May 2005 09:44 AM
 Got it...
Can't wait to stump others!
Friday, 20 May 2005 12:00 PM
chance jones said:
a/s/l?
|
|
 |
 |
Joel Garcia  |
Location:
panama
Panama
|
|
#4269
|
|
 Friday, 20 May 2005 08:37 AM
 finally got it! really nice... it's all about "mathematics" lol!!!  took me a day to solve it... it's really ez just get focus... and remember "the name of the game is very important!!!"
|
 |
Saurabh Gune  |
Location:
India
India
|
|
#4268
|
|
 Friday, 20 May 2005 06:30 AM
It took me 1 and half day to solve. But it feels very nice after solving the problem though it seems quite stupid after that.
Those who haven't solved it, i would only like to say play with real dice or images which look like dice and not by numbers. Concentrate on each dice ;)
|
 |
Helen Yeung  |
Hong Kong
|
|
#4267
|
|
 Friday, 20 May 2005 06:17 AM
Didn't really get it when I was first introduced to the game about 7 years ago. Never thought about it again until just now I got the link to the game from a friend. And to my surprise in 6 rounds I spot the pattern. In all these years, have I got smarter, or dumber?!
|
 |
Andrew Pang  |
United Kingdom
|
|
#4266
|
|
 Friday, 20 May 2005 02:51 AM
It's actually quite fun to play. Though it's similar to some of the games I played before.
|
 |
| Henry Nourse |
Australia
|
|
#4265
|
|
 Friday, 20 May 2005 12:41 AM
I was actually shown this game August of last year (2004) by a friend of mine. She herself hadn't figured out the game so i gave it a go. I tryed to solve it initially numerous times every day, still unable to understand how to get the answer. I then didn't look at it so often, but still enough to eat away in the corner of my mind. So i am now posting this triumphant, having only solved it on THIS day, and i have to say i feel pathetic. Very interesting and it makes you feel damn good when you finally figure it out. This though is why i don't like jig saw puzzles...
|
 |
| Ho Tatt Wei |
Malaysia
|
|
#4264
|
|
 Thursday, 19 May 2005 11:11 PM
Guess I'm not as smart as I thought I was ;). Solved in under 10mins. Had to throw out all forms of algorithmics. But knowing the answer now, the problem can be framed into a mathematical form (just as all easy problems can be expressed mathematically and made to look difficult)
At least, I won't suffer from sleepless nights
|
 |
Murray Henstock  |
Location:
Sydney
Australia
|
|
#4263
|
|
 Thursday, 19 May 2005 10:38 PM
Took me about 10 goes. Not as smart as some who can get it before even rolling I guess.
|
 |
Rommel  |
Location:
Sydney
Australia
|
|
#4262
|
|
 Thursday, 19 May 2005 10:34 PM
That was short for me, I figured it out befored I rolled, and then confirmed it in three rolls. Maybe it's because I'm visually orientated in learning.
Thursday, 19 May 2005 10:39 PM
Muz said:
Nicely done
|
|
 |
Robert Myers  |
Location:
Mackay
Australia
|
|
#4261
|
|
 Thursday, 19 May 2005 07:30 PM
First couple of rolls had me stumped, but then I stopped for a bit, thought about the description, and then it clicked.
|
 |