| Name |
Comments |
| Rahvindel |
Location:
Houston. TX |
|
#4650
|
|
 Monday, 6 June 2005 10:33 PM
Good one. Had it figured in 10 minutes.
|
 |
 |
neo choon jin  |
Location:
singapore
Singapore
|
|
#4649
|
|
 Monday, 6 June 2005 07:49 PM
this was a toughie
|
 |
| Rand E and Tina Q Nix |
Location:
Garland, TX
USA
|
|
#4648
|
|
 Monday, 6 June 2005 07:44 PM
We had to solve this for a geocache. Tina's sister figured it out first, then we waited for 4400 to conclude before figuring it ourselves.
|
 |
Meh  |
Location:
Singapore
Singapore
|
|
#4647
|
|
 Monday, 6 June 2005 05:58 PM
Man! It took me about 15 minutes, and I finally realised it when my sister gave me the hint about the significant name. Great stuff.
|
 |
Dave Reed  |
Location:
Iowa
USA
|
|
#4646
|
|
 Monday, 6 June 2005 04:49 PM
tried two rolls, read the article on Bill Gates, returned to the game and had it.
(feeling pretty smart, too!)
|
 |
nmatrix9  |
Location:
North Carolina
USA
|
|
#4645
|
|
 Monday, 6 June 2005 04:37 PM
Iam not sure how long it took me I wasn't watching the time but within 30-60 minutes.
|
 |
|
|
 Monday, 6 June 2005 03:40 PM
5 minutes
ok, more like half an hour :P
|
 |
| Me |
|
|
#4643
|
|
 Monday, 6 June 2005 02:34 PM
hello
|
 |
|
|
 Monday, 6 June 2005 12:34 PM
I was going to look up the answer but then I actually figured it out by myself. Is it true that the smarter you are, the longer it takes you to figure it out and vive verse? If so, i'm positivly retarted.
|
 |
| szechong |
|
|
#4641
|
|
 Monday, 6 June 2005 11:58 AM
2 hour of struggling
|
 |