| Name |
Comments |
Nathan  |
Location:
New Hampshire
USA
|
|
#5988
|
|
 Tuesday, 18 October 2005 11:26 PM
It took seeing the examples from Bill Gate's experience. I got it after about halfway through. My grilfriend's working on it after I showed it to her... :-D
|
 |
 |
|
|
 Tuesday, 18 October 2005 11:03 PM
I was sitting in a chatroom, trying to script for my client, whilst some other chatters were playing this. I absentmindedly looked in and saw the pattern after they had played 9 rounds. I had partaken in only 3 of which. ^-^
I didnt graduate at 16 for nothin'! ;)
|
 |
Beatriz  |
Location:
Seattle, WA
Mexico
|
|
#5986
|
|
 Tuesday, 18 October 2005 10:00 PM
10 seconds, got it on the second try. I must be an idiot. I do have a MS in pattern recognition, though
|
 |
Antonio  |
Location:
CO
USA
|
|
#5985
|
|
 Tuesday, 18 October 2005 09:54 PM
This test is very evil! I wasted a few hours trying math to figure this out. Before I noticed the pattern.
|
 |
|
|
 Tuesday, 18 October 2005 09:11 PM
took me weeks,man i must be intelligent
|
 |
Nic Boie  |
Location:
Minneapolis |
|
#5983
|
|
 Tuesday, 18 October 2005 08:24 PM
Took a hard look, and a real consideration of the name.. but I got it.
|
 |
Matt Boughton  |
Location:
Medford, OR
USA
|
|
#5982
|
|
 Tuesday, 18 October 2005 08:20 PM
Two trys and ten minutes, way too easy.
|
 |
Jaydeb  |
Location:
DC
USA
|
|
#5981
|
|
 Tuesday, 18 October 2005 07:49 PM
That was fun. My friend sent me a link as a distraction from some of my work, but once I looked, it was cool figuring out the pattern. I figured it out through the name, but my friend said he took two hours, and had only done it through brute-force-cracking, and didn't even figure out how the name factored in until much later.
|
 |
10fc04  |
Location:
Iowa City, IA
USA
|
|
#5980
|
|
 Tuesday, 18 October 2005 07:40 PM
Spent too much time on a false assumption about 'rose' and 'petals', specifically what part of the game those terms were referring to. Spent some time collecting and recording rolls and answers to see whether order was significant, answer was as I expected. Grouped all the rolls together into sets having the same answer, saw the patterns come out starting from the low numbers. Took about an hour. Yay.
|
 |
rebekah  |
Location:
Lexington, Kentucky
USA
|
|
#5979
|
|
 Tuesday, 18 October 2005 07:19 PM
 It took me awhile, probably about 30 minutes. I kept trying to ADD stuff together. LOL. I knew the name had to be significant, but couldn't figure out how or why. I even tried adding up the letters of the name!
|
 |