| Name |
Comments |
RubiksRevenge  |
Location:
CT
USA
|
|
#6616
|
|
 Thursday, 29 December 2005 07:37 PM
uh, so where do I get certified as a memeber? Not to brag or anything, but I was wrong on my first guess, and then I figured it out. I haven't been wrong since. Clever trick, though.
|
 |
 |
Virginia J. Welsh  |
Location:
Baltimore, MD
USA
|
|
#6615
|
|
 Thursday, 29 December 2005 02:03 PM
I thought it was a lot harder than that...
|
 |
Christopher Graves  |
Location:
Halifax, Nova Scotia
Canada
|
|
#6614
|
|
 Thursday, 29 December 2005 01:25 PM
yea, it was fun
|
 |
Heather Sturgill  |
Location:
Portland, Oregon
USA
|
|
#6613
|
|
 Thursday, 29 December 2005 09:16 AM
Well, they say that smarter people take longer to get this. Guess I'm not too smart. It took me about twenty rolls of the dice before I was sure I had it (usuing a computer program to tell me the answer to the rolls).
This is great fun, and reminded me why I liked math and puzzles.
|
 |
|
|
 Wednesday, 28 December 2005 07:38 PM
Took me a total of less than 4 hours to figure it out. Including approximately two hours about a month ago and then less than two hours today. It was bugging me that my little brother figured it out in a hour and a half, so I decided to start again today. It feels good to know but i felt robbed when I figured it out.
|
 |
DVD  |
Location:
Atlanta, Ga
USA
|
|
#6611
|
|
 Wednesday, 28 December 2005 11:42 AM
I racked my brains trying to figure this thing out. I walked away from it for a while, and had the numbers floating around in my head, and the answer smacked me in the face. So I ran back to my computer and pulled the game back up, and sure enough, I'd figured it out.
Great stuff!
|
 |
Asraf Ahmad  |
Location:
Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
|
|
#6610
|
|
 Wednesday, 28 December 2005 11:35 AM
Well i finally got it after 15 mins of thinkin..but the name of the game is really important..
|
 |
Will Randolph  |
Location:
Maryland
USA
|
|
#6609
|
|
 Wednesday, 28 December 2005 08:26 AM
I won't reiterate the argument of whether or not the amount of time spend arriving at the answer has a direct association with intelligence; however, I have a MS in Computer Science on which I initially defaulted in trying to solve the puzzle. Like the rest of the 'logically' or 'analytically minded' who posted- this put me in an infinite loop of frustration. After an hour of thinking it was a derivation of the Fibonnaci Sequence ( I remembered from undergrad that FS governs the amount of leaves on a tree or something of natural growth), I researched roses and thier stages of growth. Although I learned how to keep Aphids off of new blooms, this too got me no where. Then I came back to ...."how we define the problem"....so, how do we define the rose?
|
 |
Brandon  |
Location:
Memphis, TN
USA
|
|
#6608
|
|
 Tuesday, 27 December 2005 01:50 AM
::Sigh:: Yeah, I finally got this about 20 mind-numbing, frustrating minutes after my girlfriend showed it to me. Weeeee.... That was fun!
|
 |
Bill McDaniel  |
Location:
San Jose, CA
USA
|
|
#6607
|
|
 Monday, 26 December 2005 10:09 PM
Took about an hour of thinking about it after my wife showed me, then 15 minutes to write a program to do it and then a few minutes to reduce it to a single line equation.
I think the issue isn't that 'smarter' poeple take longer, but that more 'analytical' people take longer. I spent the most of the first hour spinning thorugh algorithms, but then thought about the name and went looking for flowers! Once I stopped thinking too much, the answer popped right up.
|
 |