| Name |
Comments |
Daniel Erlinger  |
Location:
Santa Clara
USA
|
|
#7946
|
|
 Sunday, 3 December 2006 05:39 PM
First thought that it was a mathematical reference to the name, but then just looked at the Bill Gates article and got it. Pretty simple.
|
 |
 |
| C0SB0T |
Location:
Victoria, B.C.
Canada
|
|
#7945
|
|
 Sunday, 3 December 2006 05:34 PM
I appreciate the stimulation of my brain. That was a fun few minutes of careful puzzle analysis
|
 |
Antonio Sifuentez  |
Location:
Midlothian, Illinois
USA
|
|
#7944
|
|
 Sunday, 3 December 2006 05:30 PM
This was fun, took me about 4 minutes. That is, of course, after the first 2-3 minutes of what is this randomness?
|
 |
Gary McClellan  |
Location:
Louisville, KY
United Nations
|
|
#7943
|
|
 Sunday, 3 December 2006 05:24 PM
Nice puzzle! It took me about 4 rolls.
|
 |
Karen  |
Location:
Ohio
USA
|
|
#7942
|
|
 Sunday, 3 December 2006 05:18 PM
Thank you for stimulating my brain.
|
 |
Raśl Mera-Adasme  |
Chile
|
|
#7941
|
|
 Sunday, 3 December 2006 05:11 PM
I don't know how much time it tooks. Measuring time gets me nervous 
Very nice game. I usually don't like these games but unlike others, I find this puzzle to be related to real-life scientific problems
Long life to the fraternity!
|
 |
|
|
 Sunday, 3 December 2006 05:01 PM
Took me about fifteen minutes, fifteen VERY frustrating minutes.
|
 |
Buck Rogers  |
Location:
Viera, FL
USA
|
|
#7939
|
|
 Sunday, 3 December 2006 05:01 PM
Tried math for the first for 10 minutes, found no rhyme or reason, then started over and used puzzle logic. Didn't take long at all.
|
 |
Dave Ritchie  |
Location:
KY
USA
|
|
#7938
|
|
 Sunday, 3 December 2006 04:58 PM
Tried using too much actual math. Finally got it in a 'duh' moment.
|
 |
|
|
 Sunday, 3 December 2006 04:50 PM
What silliness, but I win.
|
 |